Do you need to see how this treatise applies to a (e.g., constitutional, tax, or criminal law)?
Singh catalogues presumptions that guide interpretation unless rebutted:
The primary feature of Singh’s work is its authoritative weight. It is frequently cited by the Supreme Court of India and various High Courts.
: This rule requires that the words of a statute be given their ordinary and literal meaning, unless the context indicates otherwise. The literal rule is applied when the language of the statute is clear and unambiguous.
The meaning given to a statute by administrative authorities immediately after its enactment carries persuasive weight, especially for ancient statutes. 6. Presumptions in Statutory Interpretation principles of statutory interpretation gp singh high quality
: The mischief rule is not archaic; it is the original purposivism. However, he warns against “judicial legislation” – the purpose must emerge from the statute itself, not from judges’ policy preferences.
What distinguishes this work as "high quality" is not just its comprehensive nature, but its rigorous scientific approach to the chaotic art of interpretation. Here is a breakdown of the features that make this tome indispensable.
Justice G.P. Singh’s work meticulously breaks down the primary rules of interpretation into workable legal principles. 1. The Literal Rule (Grammatical Interpretation)
This article provides an in-depth analysis of the core principles, rules, and methodologies articulated in G.P. Singh’s masterwork. 1. The Core Philosophy of Interpretation Do you need to see how this treatise applies to a (e
As Chief Justice T. S. Thakur remarked at the launch of the 14th edition, “The need for a book on Principles of Statutory Interpretation emerges because of a gap between the presumed legislative wisdom and the actual understanding of the law by the interpreters and implementers.” Justice G. P. Singh’s book bridges that gap with unmatched clarity and authority.
What remedy did the Legislature resolve to cure the disease? The true reason for the remedy.
Justice G.P. Singh emphasizes that the first and most dominant rule of interpretation is the .
If a penal or tax law has two reasonable interpretations, the one favoring the citizen or the assessee must be adopted. No person should be penalized or taxed unless the words of the statute clearly mandate it. : This rule requires that the words of
If a penal or tax law is ambiguous, the interpretation that favors the citizen or the assessee must be adopted. No tax can be levied, and no penalty imposed, by implication. The Lasting Legacy of G.P. Singh’s Work
Are you studying this text for an , a court case , or legislative drafting ?
Singh elevates the mischief rule into what modern jurisprudence calls – especially for social welfare, consumer protection, and human rights statutes. He draws on Pepper v. Hart [1993] AC 593 (UK) and Bengal Immunity Co. v. State of Bihar (1955) (SC: “We must look at the general scope and purview of the statute and the remedy the legislature intends to apply”).